FarmPhoto.com - Photos 4 farmers.
T3RRA Cutta
Thread #497763 / / Total number of messages: 26 / Thread View Count: 4212 / Add thread to favorites:
[1][2] (page 1 of 2)
Valtramond 497763 1 fendt 916 either
fendt 916
fendt 916 met beboma 18 ton en smits aanhanger
0,0,0
Re: fendt 916
fendt 920 tms met bijlsma 1800
0,0,0
Re: fendt 916
wederom bekende machines richard ;-) mooie foto's
0,0,0
Re: fendt 916
*
5,0,0
Re: fendt 916
that wase a very helpfull coment Mustaf a Eskisehriri. very interesting input in this threat :-(
0,0,0
Re: fendt 916
Surely * isnt worthy of a peer review though Geoff? :-\
0,0,0
Re: fendt 916
Lennart has a point
0,0,0
Re: fendt 916
I did the peer review in another tread, but I think someone else sure can do it here, I can't give more than one a day.
0,0,0
Re: fendt 916
One can always switch off signatures on your profile, if they annoy you (plenty of them annoy me, so I just turn it off on my profile, easy done)
0,0,0
Re: fendt 916
TC - we have not talked about signatures - we talk about the message, and I can not see any point of posting " * " - can you?

About signatures, I think it is amusing to see everybodys signatures, specially if they like yours have a point!
0,0,0
Re: fendt 916
Einachser reviewed the post for * & said this guys signature is annoying, thats why I wrote that Lennart.

No, not alot of point in writing * I agree but is it offensive or nasty or causing a major problem? My answer to that would be NO. Maybe it was a typing error & he submitted before he meant to? Sometimes when the syetem is playing up, we get double posts when we are trying to submit comments too.
0,0,0
Re: fendt 916
Call me cynical, but posting '*' along with a massive signature looks to me like a cheap way of advertising something. I think it's spam and the peer reviews well warranted.
0,0,0
Re: fendt 916
exactly Stu . it surely wasn't a typing error bc he posted it 4 times in 4 different threads :-\
0,0,0
Re: fendt 916
I only saw it in this one, so thats why I made the comment here
0,0,0
Re: fendt 916
920
0,0,0
Re: fendt 916
712
0,0,0
Re: fendt 916
zijn deze foto's van dit jaar ? en heb je ook nog foto's van stefan in actie ?:-P
0,0,0
Re: fendt 916
ze zijn van dit jaar ja maar ik heb geen actie foto,s
0,0,0
Re: fendt 916
andere 712
0,0,0
Re: fendt 916
...
0,0,0
Re: fendt 916
kan dat ook al met dat consule van de fendt trekkers :-P
0,0,0
Re: fendt 916
920
0,0,0
Re: fendt 916
Johan Straver wrote:
Review 3
11/15/2007 Inappropriate language [-] totally bullshit
0,0,0
Re: fendt 916
TasCowboy
why only post johans review you hate the dutch and belgians dont you. double standards:-(
0,0,0
Re: fendt 916
Gilb wrote:
TasCowboy
why only post johans review you hate the dutch and belgians dont you. double standards:-(


Read the other reviews, do they use bad language? Why is there a need to use this language?

EDIT; Are you a genuine new member Gilb or just another member who has created another account? :-\
0,0,0
Loading Message List
[1][2] (page 1 of 2)
[You must sign in to add photos or messages to this thread]
.
Please Note: FarmPhoto.com does not claim ownership of the photos posted here.
Contact individual posters for permission before using any of the photos.
0.113sec